pa href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipHO7FkSIaL58D5g3NMcis3UIVMXyq8NRgkVepaqaGfJ-7lxYIUVOyyF1K-p9b8tKrae9F-xJrmassAWxOlChyphenhyphenlxcZXIe3QzMcSunq9pMp3Yn01PXBKKjB5IXY-wdWYALY7L6a0Zfa2g2L/s1600-h/nationaljournal%5B3%5D.gif"img title="nationaljournal" style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; display: inline; margin-left: 0px; border-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="37" alt="nationaljournal" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8CaujGDVQFVh3vfau_LEP-E-uP5lOvmDKxM6hdful2A_sFEhJT8kiwmW63tSiZ8g1JSJL5L0ZK3ZJ7-Z1N_rvicz5luL6ojy7Dsw9VrGB5Ga_WUGTjlLAdWb7iP6OYVEmYE8B0Elpim0-/?imgmax=800" width="244" align="right" border="0" //a Not our question – because we know the answer – but that of the The National Journal, which has a href="http://energy.nationaljournal.com/2009/06/is-nuclear-the-green-solution.php?rss=1"set up/a a forum for invited parties to grapple with the question. When we checked, some of the pro-nuclear sources had weighed in - /p ul liPaul Sullivan, Professor of Economics, National Defense University/li liElizabeth Moler, Executive Vice President for Government amp; Environmental Affairs amp; Public Policy, Exelon/li liBill Johnson, CEO, Progress Energy/li liMarvin Fertel, President and CEO, Nuclear Energy Institute/li /ul pPresumably, the folks with somewhat less sanguine views toward nuclear will be showing up as the week goes on. Here’s the introduction:/p blockquote pSenate Republicans want to build 100 new commercial nuclear power plants over the next 20 years. Over the last two years the industry has applied for licenses to build 30 new reactors, and Babcock amp; Wilcox Co. recently unveiled a new mini-nuke plant aimed at supplying power to small electricity users, such as municipal districts or individual industrial customers. But critics say nuclear power is too expensive and so risky that Wall Street won't finance the new plants. Opponents are critical of proposals for a federal loan guarantee program for low-carbon energy projects that could help finance the new nuclear plants./p /blockquote pWe won’t quote any of the responses here, pro or con, especially since the thread will grow as the week goes along, but check over there a couple times to see who’s mixing it up. Hopefully, we’ll get some counterintuitive and interesting perspectives rather than boilerplate./p div class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10911751-1874876328114952854?l=neinuclearnotes.blogspot.com'//div
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Is Nuclear the Green Solution?
pa href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipHO7FkSIaL58D5g3NMcis3UIVMXyq8NRgkVepaqaGfJ-7lxYIUVOyyF1K-p9b8tKrae9F-xJrmassAWxOlChyphenhyphenlxcZXIe3QzMcSunq9pMp3Yn01PXBKKjB5IXY-wdWYALY7L6a0Zfa2g2L/s1600-h/nationaljournal%5B3%5D.gif"img title="nationaljournal" style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; display: inline; margin-left: 0px; border-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="37" alt="nationaljournal" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8CaujGDVQFVh3vfau_LEP-E-uP5lOvmDKxM6hdful2A_sFEhJT8kiwmW63tSiZ8g1JSJL5L0ZK3ZJ7-Z1N_rvicz5luL6ojy7Dsw9VrGB5Ga_WUGTjlLAdWb7iP6OYVEmYE8B0Elpim0-/?imgmax=800" width="244" align="right" border="0" //a Not our question – because we know the answer – but that of the The National Journal, which has a href="http://energy.nationaljournal.com/2009/06/is-nuclear-the-green-solution.php?rss=1"set up/a a forum for invited parties to grapple with the question. When we checked, some of the pro-nuclear sources had weighed in - /p ul liPaul Sullivan, Professor of Economics, National Defense University/li liElizabeth Moler, Executive Vice President for Government amp; Environmental Affairs amp; Public Policy, Exelon/li liBill Johnson, CEO, Progress Energy/li liMarvin Fertel, President and CEO, Nuclear Energy Institute/li /ul pPresumably, the folks with somewhat less sanguine views toward nuclear will be showing up as the week goes on. Here’s the introduction:/p blockquote pSenate Republicans want to build 100 new commercial nuclear power plants over the next 20 years. Over the last two years the industry has applied for licenses to build 30 new reactors, and Babcock amp; Wilcox Co. recently unveiled a new mini-nuke plant aimed at supplying power to small electricity users, such as municipal districts or individual industrial customers. But critics say nuclear power is too expensive and so risky that Wall Street won't finance the new plants. Opponents are critical of proposals for a federal loan guarantee program for low-carbon energy projects that could help finance the new nuclear plants./p /blockquote pWe won’t quote any of the responses here, pro or con, especially since the thread will grow as the week goes along, but check over there a couple times to see who’s mixing it up. Hopefully, we’ll get some counterintuitive and interesting perspectives rather than boilerplate./p div class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10911751-1874876328114952854?l=neinuclearnotes.blogspot.com'//div
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment