Reading the comments a href="http://lefarkins.blogspot.com/2009/06/more-mustard-green-tea-ice-cream-gate.html"here/a, what's most striking is that Treacher et al. have yet to even attempt an argument explaining, in concrete terms, what more forceful rhetoric or more private dessert eating would span style="font-style: italic;"accomplish/span. If I can try to piece together the causal logic:br /br /ulliObama supports Iran opposition, ignores daughters, eats good American salad consisting of Kraft Mayonnaise over iceberg lettuce rather than those fancy greens and olive oils that people who never leave major urban centers assume that people outside of major urban centers have never heard ofbr //liliIranian government uses comments to paint the opposition as the cat's paw of a hated regime; opposition distances itself from Obama's comments./lili?????????/lilisProfit!/s Revolution!/li/ulI'm not really seeing it. In fairness, calling Iran the "Axis of Evil" did singlehandedly usher in an era of Democracy, Whiskey, span style="font-style: italic;"and /spanSexy in Iran, so I'm sure similar comments from Obama would be equally effectual.br /br /Meanwhile, the ill-named Socrates asks:br /br /blockquoteLet's try a thought experiment..br /br /What would you all really be saying today if it had been Booooooosh! doing this while Iran burned, instead of Obama..?br /br /Take a few minites to think; and be intellectually honest about it.../blockquoteSee, this may be shocking news to people who think that Obama can make democracy appear in Iran through his silver tongue (and they call us "Obamabots"!), but Iran is not the only tyranny in the world. This blog has been in operation for quite a long time, stretching all the way back to the Bush administration. So, for example, we can consider the case of Zimbabwe. You may recall that -- while Bush was in the White House! -- an even worse regime than the current Iranian one engaged in even more egregious and violent election theft. If you search our archives, however, you will note that at no point did I attack Bush for clearing brush instead of spending all of his time denouncing Robert Mugabe, for the obvious reason that you'd have to be a Grade A Moron to think that anything Bush said would somehow cause fair elections to be held in Zimbabwe. The same, of course, goes for the assertion that more forceful rhetoric will somehow produce a fair election in Iran. But thanks for the question!br /br /UPDATE BY ROB: Shortera href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OTM0NTQ2OTdlZTNjNTJjYjgxNzFkN2JkOGE3YTgxZjM=" Andy McCarthy/a: Barack Obama is strikeobjectively/strike pro-mullah!div class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7163938-9048728670415215456?l=lefarkins.blogspot.com'//div
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Foreign Policy Isn't About Your Feelings
Reading the comments a href="http://lefarkins.blogspot.com/2009/06/more-mustard-green-tea-ice-cream-gate.html"here/a, what's most striking is that Treacher et al. have yet to even attempt an argument explaining, in concrete terms, what more forceful rhetoric or more private dessert eating would span style="font-style: italic;"accomplish/span. If I can try to piece together the causal logic:br /br /ulliObama supports Iran opposition, ignores daughters, eats good American salad consisting of Kraft Mayonnaise over iceberg lettuce rather than those fancy greens and olive oils that people who never leave major urban centers assume that people outside of major urban centers have never heard ofbr //liliIranian government uses comments to paint the opposition as the cat's paw of a hated regime; opposition distances itself from Obama's comments./lili?????????/lilisProfit!/s Revolution!/li/ulI'm not really seeing it. In fairness, calling Iran the "Axis of Evil" did singlehandedly usher in an era of Democracy, Whiskey, span style="font-style: italic;"and /spanSexy in Iran, so I'm sure similar comments from Obama would be equally effectual.br /br /Meanwhile, the ill-named Socrates asks:br /br /blockquoteLet's try a thought experiment..br /br /What would you all really be saying today if it had been Booooooosh! doing this while Iran burned, instead of Obama..?br /br /Take a few minites to think; and be intellectually honest about it.../blockquoteSee, this may be shocking news to people who think that Obama can make democracy appear in Iran through his silver tongue (and they call us "Obamabots"!), but Iran is not the only tyranny in the world. This blog has been in operation for quite a long time, stretching all the way back to the Bush administration. So, for example, we can consider the case of Zimbabwe. You may recall that -- while Bush was in the White House! -- an even worse regime than the current Iranian one engaged in even more egregious and violent election theft. If you search our archives, however, you will note that at no point did I attack Bush for clearing brush instead of spending all of his time denouncing Robert Mugabe, for the obvious reason that you'd have to be a Grade A Moron to think that anything Bush said would somehow cause fair elections to be held in Zimbabwe. The same, of course, goes for the assertion that more forceful rhetoric will somehow produce a fair election in Iran. But thanks for the question!br /br /UPDATE BY ROB: Shortera href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OTM0NTQ2OTdlZTNjNTJjYjgxNzFkN2JkOGE3YTgxZjM=" Andy McCarthy/a: Barack Obama is strikeobjectively/strike pro-mullah!div class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7163938-9048728670415215456?l=lefarkins.blogspot.com'//div
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment