F-22 Death Agony (Hopefully...)

Spencer has been following the F-22 debate closer than I; it appears that Carl Levin a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/51087/obama-reiterates-f-22-veto-threat"lacks the votes/a to outright kill the F-22, and thus that the potential for a confrontation between Congress and the administration over the survival of the plane remains high. Spencer points to some a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/51420/more-f-22-backstory-shortchanging-the-coin-fight"skepticism /awithin the Air Force over the utility of the plane, although it's telling that the essay is written by a Captain rather than someone with any significant influence. Matt Duss a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/07/14/what-the-f-22-debate-is-really-about/"makes the point/a, however, that the real issue here isn't the utility of the F-22 against some Russian fighter that has yet to move off the drawing board, or even the 95000 [sic] poor souls who'll be thrown on the street if the plane is canceled. Rather, the question is about how effective the massive industry lobbying effort will be, and how effective the production strategy (48 states producing some component) will be in winning the political fight. br /br /Meanwhile, the Afghan Air Force is now a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ArmchairGeneralist/~3/ZyE5Wrn9YEQ/afghani-air-force.html"flying Mi-35s/a. History, odd sense of humor, etc.div class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7163938-2591628180116840784?l=lefarkins.blogspot.com'//div