a href="http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2009/08/there-he-goes-again.html"Tom Maguire .../abr /br /blockquotespan style="color:#3333ff;"Somebody call White House flack Linda Douglass at Fishy-1-1 - Mickey Kaus is circulating discouraging arguments suggesting Obama's risky health reform scheme might actually lead to "death panels", and yet again he is relying on Obama's own words:br /br /If, as Harold Pollack argues, "rationing of life-saving or life-extending care" would not really be a priority for the "effectiveness" panels--such as the Obama-endorsed IMAC--then it was all the more stupid to bring the topic up, no? Here's the first graf from a Bloomberg account of an early Obama health care foray back in April:br /April 29 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama said his grandmother’s hip-replacement surgery during the final weeks of her life made him wonder whether expensive procedures for the terminally ill reflect a “sustainable model” for health care.br /br /Gee, where could the misinformed town hall crazies have gotten the idea that Obama was thinking about saving money by denying expensive procedures toward the end of life? ... [via Dish] ... 1:49 P.M./span/blockquotebr /Team Obama insists it's just a LIE, a LIE, I tell you ...br /br /blockquotespan style="color:#3333ff;"So Obama "suspects" that the legislative process will produce some sort of independent group that can give non-determinative "guidance" on end-of-life care for the chronically ill, with an eye towards saving money. Just don't call them death panels!/span/blockquotebr /I mean, how else you gonna save money? No hip replacement for you if you're too old! And the young don't need hips and knees and arthritis racked joints replaced. Think of the cost saving! it's mind boggling!br /br /a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/kausfiles/archive/2009/08/12/will-you-won-t-you-be-on-my-death-panel.aspx"And Mickey Kaus opines/a:br /blockquotespan style="color:#3333ff;"Yikes. ... I'm sure the "not determinative" part was very important to Obama. Still! He's talking about a panel of independent experts making end-of-life recommendations in order to save costs that have an effect at an individual level. And he thought it would be in the bill that emerges. ... It's also pretty clear that something like the "IMAC" panel is what he has in mind. Whether or not the IMAC would actually do this--Harold Pollack says end-of-life issues are well down the curve-bender's list, for example--Obama thought it would do it. . ./span/blockquotebr /br /Racists.div class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7158917-7988067026972080740?l=moneyrunner.blogspot.com'//div
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Government Health Care and "Death Panels" (Just call them "end of life decision panels")
a href="http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2009/08/there-he-goes-again.html"Tom Maguire .../abr /br /blockquotespan style="color:#3333ff;"Somebody call White House flack Linda Douglass at Fishy-1-1 - Mickey Kaus is circulating discouraging arguments suggesting Obama's risky health reform scheme might actually lead to "death panels", and yet again he is relying on Obama's own words:br /br /If, as Harold Pollack argues, "rationing of life-saving or life-extending care" would not really be a priority for the "effectiveness" panels--such as the Obama-endorsed IMAC--then it was all the more stupid to bring the topic up, no? Here's the first graf from a Bloomberg account of an early Obama health care foray back in April:br /April 29 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama said his grandmother’s hip-replacement surgery during the final weeks of her life made him wonder whether expensive procedures for the terminally ill reflect a “sustainable model” for health care.br /br /Gee, where could the misinformed town hall crazies have gotten the idea that Obama was thinking about saving money by denying expensive procedures toward the end of life? ... [via Dish] ... 1:49 P.M./span/blockquotebr /Team Obama insists it's just a LIE, a LIE, I tell you ...br /br /blockquotespan style="color:#3333ff;"So Obama "suspects" that the legislative process will produce some sort of independent group that can give non-determinative "guidance" on end-of-life care for the chronically ill, with an eye towards saving money. Just don't call them death panels!/span/blockquotebr /I mean, how else you gonna save money? No hip replacement for you if you're too old! And the young don't need hips and knees and arthritis racked joints replaced. Think of the cost saving! it's mind boggling!br /br /a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/kausfiles/archive/2009/08/12/will-you-won-t-you-be-on-my-death-panel.aspx"And Mickey Kaus opines/a:br /blockquotespan style="color:#3333ff;"Yikes. ... I'm sure the "not determinative" part was very important to Obama. Still! He's talking about a panel of independent experts making end-of-life recommendations in order to save costs that have an effect at an individual level. And he thought it would be in the bill that emerges. ... It's also pretty clear that something like the "IMAC" panel is what he has in mind. Whether or not the IMAC would actually do this--Harold Pollack says end-of-life issues are well down the curve-bender's list, for example--Obama thought it would do it. . ./span/blockquotebr /br /Racists.div class="blogger-post-footer"img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7158917-7988067026972080740?l=moneyrunner.blogspot.com'//div
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment