The comments here focusing (correctly) on the age of potential judicial appointments -- a problem given that current norms favor appellate judges and there hasn't been a Democratic president for 8 years (and moreover that president mostly had a Republican Senate and didn't make judges a high priority) -- reminds me that it would be much better for justices to be appointed to fixed, non-renewable terms. This would (largely) fix the problem of some presidents randomly getting more appointments than others and age being given an inappropriate priority in nominating decisions.
Monday, February 9, 2009
Institutional Reform Note
The comments here focusing (correctly) on the age of potential judicial appointments -- a problem given that current norms favor appellate judges and there hasn't been a Democratic president for 8 years (and moreover that president mostly had a Republican Senate and didn't make judges a high priority) -- reminds me that it would be much better for justices to be appointed to fixed, non-renewable terms. This would (largely) fix the problem of some presidents randomly getting more appointments than others and age being given an inappropriate priority in nominating decisions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment